top of page

Circumcision

Choice.com

Uncircumcised, not intact, is the correct term

Uncircumcised, not intact, is the correct term

Andrew Gross Published August 7, 2021 Updated December 21, 2022 Circumcision proponents typically refer to a penis with foreskin as...

Featured Posts

The ethics of circumcision

The ethics of circumcision

Court rejects intactivist lawsuit against Mass. Medicaid

Court rejects intactivist lawsuit against Mass. Medicaid

Uncircumcised, not intact, is the correct term

Uncircumcised, not intact, is the correct term

15 square inches of erogenous tissue?

15 square inches of erogenous tissue?

Doctors Opposing Circumcision is a sham

Doctors Opposing Circumcision is a sham

Intactivism is a Mental Disorder

Intactivism is a Mental Disorder

Does circumcision cause psychological damage?

Does circumcision cause psychological damage?

The United States Constitution and circumcision

The United States Constitution and circumcision

Of all the nerves

Of all the nerves

The 16 Foreskin Functions - a critical analysis

The 16 Foreskin Functions - a critical analysis

Recent Posts

The disingenuity of intactivists

The irate Man uses our post to attack Intact America

Counterfeit Jews

New Hampshire legislation would severely restrict circumcision

Circumcision is not mutilation

The 2023 AAP Counter-Protest

Supreme Court rejects Clopper v Harvard appeal

Intactivists hate P!nk because her son removed his diaper

Was biblical circumcision different from circumcision today?

Intactivist civil war includes bizarre accusations about Circumcision Choice

Archive

Search By Tags

Follow Us

bottom of page