The disingenuity of intactivists

The irate Man uses our post to attack Intact America

Counterfeit Jews

New Hampshire legislation would severely restrict circumcision

Circumcision is not mutilation

The 2023 AAP Counter-Protest

Supreme Court rejects Clopper v Harvard appeal

Intactivists hate P!nk because her son removed his diaper

Was biblical circumcision different from circumcision today?

Intactivist civil war includes bizarre accusations about Circumcision Choice

The ethics of circumcision

Court rejects intactivist lawsuit against Mass. Medicaid

Uncircumcised, not intact, is the correct term

15 square inches of erogenous tissue?

Doctors Opposing Circumcision is a sham

Intactivism is a Mental Disorder

Does circumcision cause psychological damage?

The United States Constitution and circumcision

Of all the nerves

The 16 Foreskin Functions - a critical analysis

Circumcision methods

January 9, 2021

Circumcision practitioners in North America typically use one of three methods to remove the foreskin: Gomco clamp, Mogen clamp, or Plastibell.

We agree with Intact America that parents should view videos to better understand the procedure that their son will receive. However we're confused as to why Intact America would believe that doctors don't want parents to see such videos. Parents understand that even a minor surgical procedure isn't pretty. Popular reality TV shows like Trauma: Life in the E.R. and My 600-lb life depict essential and elective surgery with blood and gore.

At any rate, we're sharing links to the Stanford University website where these videos are posted. The videos are apparently intended as instructional training aids for medical students. Each video shows a newborn circumcision method in graphic detail; surgical tools are used to separate the foreskin from the glans and shaft. The videos - shot in an operating room - may include distracting voices and other background noises in addition to the instructor's narration.